Florida Senator Mike Fasano not afraid to talk about the elephant in the room. Yesterday, he called the proposed insurance bill "scary". A blog in the Miami Herald Fasano: why sinkhole to debate, when no one will offer more coverage? reported:
[T] his account, he said, is fatal to consumers. A bill like this, he said would Jeb Bush or Charlie Crist, come friendly State leading Rick Scott forward under Governor but with uber-business legislators feel encouraged an invoice which is too generous for the insurance industry. "It's scary," he said.
In draconian property insurance bill stored in Florida Senate my impression of the proposed legislation was found. Deadly, scary and draconian sound pretty bad for consumers of insurance. I wonder why others don't see it that way?
I think Fasano answers this question in the quote above. Some in our legislative feel the insurance industry and its concerns are crucial for the interests of many policyholders. There seems little reason and good public policy reasons consumers hear. I hope the debate will change and honest reflection about the study of problems running. Otherwise Mike Fasano's prediction of the impact of the proposed insurance laws as currently written are that same as mine.
No comments:
Post a Comment